Vital Football

Latest Nottingham Forest News

Is 4-4-2 dead?

Is 4-4-2 dead?

It's as traditional as Fish and Chips, the Royal Family and Colin Slater - but has the era of the old 4-4-2 formation come to an end? Many of Europe's top teams have abandoned the old set in stone line up and it seems our Stranraer supremo has done likewise - but is he right to do that? Does modern football need a modern formation?

It seems inevitable that come the big kick off in August Colin Calderwood sending out his charges in a 4-3-3/4-5-1 formation. He's built a squad containing winger-cum-striker types in Arron Davies, Garath McCleary, Paul Anderson and he is seemingly trying (rightly or wrongly) to fit Nathan Tyson into this mould. He's also previously spoke of his distrust of our form in a 442 and preserved with 4-3-3/4-5-1 through to the dramatic climax of last season.

In recent weeks the old warhorses of the City Ground scene have been sharpening their knives and calling on olCC to retreat and go back to 4-4-2 - but are they right?

In Calderwood's favour is the fact that the new formation is much more flexible. It allows for greater numbers behind the ball when defending and greater emphasis going forward from the very nature of the fact it morphs from 451 to 433. It suits a counter attacking team with pace as its strength, something CC desperately wants from his Tricky Trees.

Very often as well it can turn into a 442, if necessary, with a wide man tucking back and a winger pushing forwards, showing an inbuilt ability to alter without substitution. 433/451 also contains a space for the 'Makelele role' - that tireless enforcer who patrols the midfield stifling out attacks - important for defensive stability.

4-4-2 by comparison has had a tendency to look pedestrian. Witness Germany's transition when they changed from a flat, flimsy 4-4-2 to a dynamic 4-3-3/4-5-1 mid European championship which took them further in the tournament than their abilities should have expressed.

One argument in the Evening Post - from one of those sages Burns or Birtles - said that Forest had been undone by '4-4-2 teams' such as Doncaster last year. Whoever it was obviously hadn't paid much attention to League One's most stylish passing outfit. O'Driscoll often tinkered but mainly stuck with what could be described as a 4-3-3/4-5-1 formation which outwitted many of less talented League One line ups. Many others are choosing this option now too. Ferguson secured the Premier League title with a swashbuckling 433, Chelsea pushed them to the wire by returning the Mourinho's old 433/451 and the Champions League version of Benitez's Liverpool are much more dangerous than their domestic alter ego, playing a 4-2-3-1.

It's not enough to choose a formation because others are but it's certainly worth considering why successful sides are looking beyond 4-4-2.

Flexibility, innovation and keeping up with the Jones' may be one thing however but the chief concerns with maintaining this formation in the Championship may well be deficiencies in the current starting 11 on Trentside.

433/451 requires strong full backs to be able to cope without constant cover and there are still question marks over Luke Chambers' ability in that role and maybe Jules' discipline on the other flank.

Questions may also be raised about the 'winger-cum-strikers' in the squad. They need to do a lot of work to make the formation viable and have to have an impact for it to be successful. Davies, Anderson and Tyson have had or are having injury concerns and all four (including McCleary) are unproven at this level.

The other issue is the striking role. Many times last year Forest frustratingly looked limp going forward because of a lack of support for the central striker. Done badly 4-3-3/4-5-1 could leave Earnshaw/Cole/Garner/Tyson chasing shadows and wasting their undoubted talent.

Those points will need to be resolved over the season but for now it's obvious that CC wants his 4-3-3/4-5-1. It also seems obvious to this blogger that we should not just dismiss this out of hand. I don't profess to know whether CC's formation will work but the days when 4-4-2 was the best and most viable option are gone and calling for 4-4-2 for 4-4-2's sake doesn't make sense. Managers are opting for more flexible models in ever increasing numbers - let's just hope CC knows how to make it work here next season. Over to you Colin....

t10red has his own Blog, which is well worth checking out HERE

Win FREE pizza with Vital Football!
Select your team and get 50% off if they score twice.
www.papajohns.co.uk/football




Join the FREE Telegraph Championship Fantasy Football League!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:t10red
Date:Sunday July 27 2008
Time: 3:35PM

Best of Vital Network

Comments

0
These things go in cycles. Give it a while and someone will win the league playing a 'radical' 4-4-2 formation and then it will catch on again all over the place, and everyone will be doing it.
monkeyg
01/08/2008 21:45:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Nottingham Forest Articles

Nottingham Forest v Wolves - Team Sheets

Nottingham Forest are at the City Ground with Wolverhampton Wanderers the visitors today, this is a 3pm kick-off - the line-ups have been confirmed.

Forest - Premier League Free Transfers 2015/16

As the summer nears and contracts come to an end, should Nottingham Forest be interested in any of the following free transfers?

Forest v Wolves; Vital's Match Pr

Paul Williams' Forest welcome Kenny Jackett's Wolves Trentside for the final home fixture of the season.

Reid Wants A Repeat Performance

Coach Andy Reid has called on Nottingham Forest to start where they left off when we face Wolverhampton Wanderers this season.

Archived Vital Forest Articles

Vital Forest articles from

Site Journalists

Kev Finnegan
no email
Profile
Our Kids Dad
Editor email
Profile
Those Feet
no email
Profile
WillT
no email
Profile
Galaxy42
no email
Profile
Mark2310
no email
Profile
bazforest
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Fulham MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
de Vries10%
Lichaj0%
Mills0%
Fox4%
Jokic13%
Cohen4%
Tesche13%
Gardner0%
Osborn0%
Lansbury56%
Blackstock0%
Sub - Assombalonga0%

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Middlesbrough 45 26 10 9 88 32
2 Burnley 44 24 15 5 87 33
3 Brighton 44 24 15 5 87 30
4 Hull City 44 23 11 10 80 31
5 Derby County 44 21 14 9 77 24
6 Sheff Wed 44 18 17 9 71 19
7 Cardiff 44 17 16 11 67 8
8 Ipswich 44 16 15 13 63 0
9 Birmingham 45 16 14 15 62 4
10 Brentford 44 17 8 19 59 -2
11 Preston 44 14 16 14 58 -1
12 Leeds Utd 44 14 16 14 58 -7
13 Q.P.R. 44 13 18 13 57 0
14 Wolves 44 13 15 16 54 -6
15 Reading 44 13 13 18 52 -4
16 Huddersfield 44 13 12 19 51 -3
17 Forest 44 12 15 17 51 -5
18 Blackburn 44 11 16 17 49 -3
19 Rotherham 44 13 10 21 49 -13
20 Bristol City 44 12 13 19 49 -20
21 Fulham 44 11 15 18 48 -11
R MK Dons 44 9 12 23 39 -28
R Charlton 44 8 13 23 37 -38
R Bolton 44 4 15 25 27 -40
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Nottingham Forest Results (view all)

Nottingham Forest Fixtures (view all)

Apr 30 2016 3:00PM : Wolverhampton Wanderers (H)
Sky Bet Championship
May 7 2016 12:30PM : Milton Keynes Dons (a)
Sky Bet Championship

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Apollyon397
2.PVH372
3.da fuq355
4.Jimmy Gordon346
5.the jock339
6.Calvin Plummer334
7.Pope John XXIII308
8.orbitalforest292
9.Ingy251
10.ThePromisedLand199