Vital Football

Latest Nottingham Forest News

Is 4-4-2 dead?

Is 4-4-2 dead?

It's as traditional as Fish and Chips, the Royal Family and Colin Slater - but has the era of the old 4-4-2 formation come to an end? Many of Europe's top teams have abandoned the old set in stone line up and it seems our Stranraer supremo has done likewise - but is he right to do that? Does modern football need a modern formation?

It seems inevitable that come the big kick off in August Colin Calderwood sending out his charges in a 4-3-3/4-5-1 formation. He's built a squad containing winger-cum-striker types in Arron Davies, Garath McCleary, Paul Anderson and he is seemingly trying (rightly or wrongly) to fit Nathan Tyson into this mould. He's also previously spoke of his distrust of our form in a 442 and preserved with 4-3-3/4-5-1 through to the dramatic climax of last season.

In recent weeks the old warhorses of the City Ground scene have been sharpening their knives and calling on olCC to retreat and go back to 4-4-2 - but are they right?

In Calderwood's favour is the fact that the new formation is much more flexible. It allows for greater numbers behind the ball when defending and greater emphasis going forward from the very nature of the fact it morphs from 451 to 433. It suits a counter attacking team with pace as its strength, something CC desperately wants from his Tricky Trees.

Very often as well it can turn into a 442, if necessary, with a wide man tucking back and a winger pushing forwards, showing an inbuilt ability to alter without substitution. 433/451 also contains a space for the 'Makelele role' - that tireless enforcer who patrols the midfield stifling out attacks - important for defensive stability.

4-4-2 by comparison has had a tendency to look pedestrian. Witness Germany's transition when they changed from a flat, flimsy 4-4-2 to a dynamic 4-3-3/4-5-1 mid European championship which took them further in the tournament than their abilities should have expressed.

One argument in the Evening Post - from one of those sages Burns or Birtles - said that Forest had been undone by '4-4-2 teams' such as Doncaster last year. Whoever it was obviously hadn't paid much attention to League One's most stylish passing outfit. O'Driscoll often tinkered but mainly stuck with what could be described as a 4-3-3/4-5-1 formation which outwitted many of less talented League One line ups. Many others are choosing this option now too. Ferguson secured the Premier League title with a swashbuckling 433, Chelsea pushed them to the wire by returning the Mourinho's old 433/451 and the Champions League version of Benitez's Liverpool are much more dangerous than their domestic alter ego, playing a 4-2-3-1.

It's not enough to choose a formation because others are but it's certainly worth considering why successful sides are looking beyond 4-4-2.

Flexibility, innovation and keeping up with the Jones' may be one thing however but the chief concerns with maintaining this formation in the Championship may well be deficiencies in the current starting 11 on Trentside.

433/451 requires strong full backs to be able to cope without constant cover and there are still question marks over Luke Chambers' ability in that role and maybe Jules' discipline on the other flank.

Questions may also be raised about the 'winger-cum-strikers' in the squad. They need to do a lot of work to make the formation viable and have to have an impact for it to be successful. Davies, Anderson and Tyson have had or are having injury concerns and all four (including McCleary) are unproven at this level.

The other issue is the striking role. Many times last year Forest frustratingly looked limp going forward because of a lack of support for the central striker. Done badly 4-3-3/4-5-1 could leave Earnshaw/Cole/Garner/Tyson chasing shadows and wasting their undoubted talent.

Those points will need to be resolved over the season but for now it's obvious that CC wants his 4-3-3/4-5-1. It also seems obvious to this blogger that we should not just dismiss this out of hand. I don't profess to know whether CC's formation will work but the days when 4-4-2 was the best and most viable option are gone and calling for 4-4-2 for 4-4-2's sake doesn't make sense. Managers are opting for more flexible models in ever increasing numbers - let's just hope CC knows how to make it work here next season. Over to you Colin....

t10red has his own Blog, which is well worth checking out HERE




Join the FREE Telegraph Championship Fantasy Football League!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:t10red
Date:Sunday July 27 2008
Time: 3:35PM

Comments

0
These things go in cycles. Give it a while and someone will win the league playing a 'radical' 4-4-2 formation and then it will catch on again all over the place, and everyone will be doing it.
monkeyg
01/08/2008 21:45:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Nottingham Forest Articles

Forest Confirm Traore Arrival

Traore made his name with Arsenal but also had loan spells with Portsmouth & Juventus with him most recently at QPR, they released him at the end of his contract this summer.

Reid Retirement Announced

After starting his career with Nottingham Forest Reid went onto play for Tottenham, Charlton & Sunderland before returning in 2011 making 290 appearances in total scoring 42-goals.

Behaviour Rules - Some Initial Reaction

Various rules on what is and isn't acceptable are being rolled out this season in an attempt to reduce 'intolerable behaviour' towards match day officials. What's the initial reaction?

Forest Ease Fan Capacity Concerns

Potentially showing how much of an exact Elf and Safety issue this whole capacity problem is with Nottinghamshire County Council - Nottingham Forest have...

Archived Vital Forest Articles

Vital Forest articles from

Site Journalists

Kev Finnegan
no email
Profile
Our Kids Dad
Editor email
Profile
Those Feet
no email
Profile
WillT
no email
Profile
Galaxy42
no email
Profile
Mark2310
no email
Profile
bazforest
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

MK Dons MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
de Vries9%
Lichaj1%
Mills1%
Fox2%
Jokic10%
Tesche1%
Gardner1%
Cohen33%
O Burke1%
O'Grady1%
Osborn3%
Sub - Mancienne1%
Sub - Assombalonga34%
Sub - Mendes da Graca2%

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Barnsley 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Birmingham 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Blackburn 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Bristol City 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Burton 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Cardiff 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Derby County 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Huddersfield 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 Leeds Utd 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Norwich 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 Preston 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 Q.P.R. 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 Rotherham 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 Sheff Wed 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 Wigan 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 Wolves 0 0 0 0 0 0
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Nottingham Forest Results (view all)

Nottingham Forest Fixtures (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Apollyon603
2.Jimmy Gordon463
3.the jock386
4.Pope John XXIII306
5.Ingy239
6.PVH234
7.AdebolaCornflakes228
8.marshal99189
9.mao tse tung169
10.radfordinlondon169