Vital Football

Latest Nottingham Forest News

Déjà vu For Forest?

Déjà vu For Forest?

Following Lee Camp`s heroics against Derby in the league encounter at Pride Park, my old man, a life-long fan who has been known to be a little on the pessimistic side towards the club`s management, expressed the importance of tying down our on-loan goalkeeper on a permanent contract. He argued Doughty and Forest would not want to splash the cash on Camp and better his wages at QPR. Instead, he said, we would look to the loan market for signings, with Doughty not wanting to risk adding to the wage bill without knowing which league we would be playing in next term. At the time I dismissed this out of hand. How could the club fail to see the positive influence Camp had had on the team, squad, and indeed, club? Surely Doughty and Co would go all out over the course of the transfer window to ensure we had both the quality and the quantity to avoid another miserable spell down in League One? How wrong I appear to have been, and right my Dad was! The transfer window came and went with no new players forthcoming, and Camp departing, seemingly for good. Did we ever intend to purchase players in the window? I think not. If we had, we would have made sure we secured the players we wanted and needed, opposed to submitted half-hearted bids on the on the verge of the window closing, when there was no time to negotiate should the bids get (inevitably) rejected. The manager`s comments yesterday only support this theory ("I came here on January 5 and I knew exactly what the window would hold for us").

While it cannot be denied the Forest board spent big in the summer, the bulk of the expense was spent on two players in Earnshaw (£2.65M) and Garner (£1.14M). The rest of the summer arrivals came in the form of untried Moussi, loanee Anderson and 36 year-old Cole. The latter has since left the club, lasting barely a couple of months, and the others are currently long-term absentees. Spending such a large proportion of your budget on two players (one of whom you knew was expected to be out until November) is in itself a big gamble, and one that appears to have backfired following the injuries the club have had to deal with over the course of the season. What is most frustrating is the fact the board have seemingly failed to learn their lessons from earlier on this term, and are set to follow the same 'minimum expense/maximum risk` strategy for the remainder of the season. This means continuing to play players out of position, and expecting young, inexperienced academy players to consistently compete against the experienced, established sides in this league - all this in the midst of a relegation battle. In order to succeed at this level, teams have to be well organised at the back and potent in front of goal. Had the chance at the end of the game last night fallen to a senior replacement for Earnshaw (or indeed Cole?) opposed to the untried and untested trainee Byrne, the match may indeed have gone in our favour. Tightly-contested games are defined by such moments.

Sitting here in Boston, Massachusetts, and comparing the squad available last night to that of last season, there were no new faces in the Forest ranks. Furthermore, alongside Perch and Tyson, who both failed to finish due to injuries, last term we had a squad possessing the likes of Commons, Clingan, Holt, Agogo, Davies, Bennett and loanee Omerod - none of whom were available for the match last night, for different reasons (barring Commons, technically speaking!). It`s not hard to see our squad is currently significantly weaker than the one that stumbled to promotion last term. How, and why, do we find ourselves in this situation? It smacks of bad management. While it cannot be expected they predict when and how many players will get injured, some contingency to such a situation is needed by the men at the top. It is their job to plan for such situations, after all. The squad was ill-prepared to tackle Championship football in the summer, and, for whatever reason, nothing has been done to improve the situation over the course of January. A combination of mismanagement and lack of investment in the side led to a shameful sink into the lower reaches of English football not so long ago. Forest began that fateful campaign at Wigan pairing 18 year-old debutant Perch with coach Des Walker, who had to be brought out of retirement to alleviate the club`s injury crisis. Only yesterday, Billy Davies admitted he was almost forced to sign up 43 year-old assistant manager David Kelly to face the Rams for last night`s match. Let`s hope what we`re seeing is prudent, long-term planning by the club - as opposed to a case of déjà vu.

Thanks to Alex for his insightful thoughts on Forest. If you would like to contribute an article on anything Forest related, you can get in touch by contacting forest@vitalfootball.co.uk.






Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Alex Dunn
Date:Thursday February 5 2009
Time: 3:56PM

Comments

0
Some interesting thoughts here - however I prefer to look to a brighter future & have faith in the manager to ensure he gets the personnel he wants - he came in too close to the window closing to make a call on what he needs. We will survive this season & get the players we want in the summer - Billy's players. Come On You Reds!
Old Big Ed
06/02/2009
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Nottingham Forest Articles

Al Hasawi Agrees Forest Sale?

It's being reported this evening that Fawaz Al Hasawi has agreed terms on the sale of Nottingham Forest to new a new owner - the often speculated Evangelos Marinakis.

Lichaj The Supporters Winner

Full back Eric Lichaj may have doubts over his future at the club with no new deal secured yet, but he's a winner in the eyes of the Nottingham Forest fans.

Warburton Focused On QPR

Manager Mark Warburton has challenged the Nottingham Forest players to hold their nerve and secure safety in this weekend's tie against Queens Park Rangers.

Worrall Ready For QPR

Youngster Joe Worrall has said that he feels the Nottingham Forest boys are ready for the battle that will be Queens Park Rangers this weekend.

Archived Vital Forest Articles

Vital Forest articles from

Site Journalists

Kev Finnegan
no email
Profile
Our Kids Dad
Editor email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Queens Park Rangers v Nottingham Forest
Suggested By:
Forest win29%
QPR win14%
Draw50%

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
P Brighton 44 28 8 8 92 35
P Newcastle 44 27 7 10 88 40
3 Huddersfield 44 25 6 13 81 3
4 Reading 44 24 7 13 79 1
5 Sheff Wed 44 23 9 12 78 15
6 Fulham 44 21 13 10 76 27
7 Leeds Utd 44 22 7 15 73 14
8 Norwich 44 19 9 16 66 12
9 Brentford 44 18 9 17 63 12
10 Derby County 44 17 12 15 63 2
11 Preston 44 16 13 15 61 2
12 Aston Villa 44 16 13 15 61 0
13 Cardiff 44 16 11 17 59 -2
14 Barnsley 44 15 12 17 57 0
15 Wolves 44 15 10 19 55 -3
16 Ipswich 44 13 16 15 55 -6
17 Bristol City 44 14 9 21 51 -6
18 Burton 44 13 12 19 51 -12
19 Q.P.R. 44 14 8 22 50 -12
20 Forest 44 13 9 22 48 -11
21 Birmingham 44 11 14 19 47 -22
22 Blackburn 44 10 15 19 45 -15
23 Wigan 44 10 11 23 41 -16
R Rotherham 44 5 6 33 21 -58
Write for Vital Football
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
The Vital Football Members League

Recent Nottingham Forest Results (view all)

Nottingham Forest Fixtures (view all)

Apr 29 2017 3:00PM : Queens Park Rangers (a)
Sky Bet Championship
May 7 2017 12:00PM : Ipswich Town (H)
Sky Bet Championship

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Pope John XXIII376
2.Calvin Plummer224
3.LyttleByLyttle193
4.Apollyon190
5.orbitalforest169
6.mao tse tung136
7.the jock116
8.Sniffer Dog112
9.Old Red Fart102
10.da fuq98
Vital Football Comment